+44 (0) 20 7421 8052
Theo has a broad practice focusing on public law and civil areas. Theo also continues to appear in the Crown Court in complex criminal matters and accepts instructions in the Special Educational Needs (SEN) Tribunal.
Theo is a passionate pro bono advocate. Beyond his immigration experience and current pro bono activities (see above), prior to commencing independent practice he gained pro bono experience in a wide variety of areas, including representing numerous clients as a Free Representation Unit volunteer in employment and social security matters, drafting case documents, helping negotiate settlements (including, in one case, to a value of £30,000), and representing clients in the Employment and Social Security Tribunals from 2015 to 2019. Additionally from 2015-16 he assisted the National Centre for Domestic Violence on numerous County Court injunction matters.
WAS (Pakistan) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 894
Successfully appeared (led by Eric Fripp) in an international protection case where Court of Appeal made further observations regarding the evidential limits that may constrain Appellants who claim that surveillance of their sur place activities by the hostile state has taken place.
Major v Kirishana  EWHC 1593 (KB)
Successful appeal against an interlocutory decision which had refused a litigation friend’s application to be discharged on grounds of poor mental health and withdrawal of consent to act. High Court set new test for an application to discharge litigation friend, largely adopting appellant’s submissions.
Permission granted in JR of local authority’s failure to conduct a lawful child in need assessment where an age-disputed asylum seeker was referred to them for assessment and support. The local authority purported to accept the claimed date of birth of the claimant when assessing him, finding he was under-age, but returned him to adult accommodation without further support or assistance given the proximity of his (claimed) 18th birthday. Lengthy extension of time for bringing JR was granted and the matter ultimately settled.
R (LYB) v Kent CC  EWHC 663 (Admin)
Permission granted in decision which affirmed the lower threshold for permission decisions in age assessment cases, and found that in an application for interim relief to have the claimant accommodated as a child pending determination of the JR, the balance of convenience was ‘clearly’ in favour of the grant of interim relief, following the reasoning of Fordham KC in R (BG) v Oxfordshire County Council  EWHC 3187 (Admin)
Tekocak  EWCA Crim 724
Appeared (without lead counsel) in Court of Appeal.
Areas of expertise
Theo has been representing clients in the employment tribunals since 2016.
Since coming to the Bar, he has worked on numerous employment matters of all stripes, for both Respondents and Claimants, and regularly appears in lengthy full trials on liability and quantum. He has also advised on and appeared in complex strategic litigation, and represents clients at both judicial and private mediations. Recent trial matters have involved complex collections of claims focusing primarily on discrimination matters, including direct and indirect race discrimination and disability discrimination, victimisation, s.15 discrimination arising from disability, failures to make reasonable adjustments, and constructive dismissal and unfair dismissal matters etc. Pending trials include more discrimination claims, and a breach of contract and unlawful deductions TUPE matter.
Prior to coming to the Bar Theo had already appeared in the employment tribunals for a number of years on a pro bono basis with FRU and other organisations, including e.g. in a matter for Kensington & Chelsea CAB involving 10 heads of claim for which he drafted pleadings, appeared at Tribunal on behalf of the client, and which resulted in a £30k settlement.
Theo represents immigration and asylum clients in both the First-Tier and Upper Tribunals, as well as appearing in judicial review proceedings in the High Court.
Prior to coming to the Bar Theo had already gained extensive experience in the immigration and asylum fields, having worked at the leading specialist firm Luqmani Thompson & Partners as a Law Society-accredited Senior Caseworker. In that role he had personal conduct of numerous asylum claims, specialising in particular in UASC (unaccompanied asylum-seeking child) cases. This included working with victims of trafficking and victims of torture, in tandem with organisations such as Freedom from Torture.
During his time at Luqmani Thompson, Theo also assisted the senior partners on a wide range of immigration and public law matters including at the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court level (e.g. WA (Pakistan) v SSHD EWCA Civ 302), conducting legal and country research as well as other casework tasks, and working on complex criminal deport matters as well as on public law actions such as injunctive relief applications (stays on removal).
Additionally, as part of his own caseload Theo advised and represented private clients making human rights-based applications, and had conduct of Tribunal appeals.
Theo’s first practical contact with the area of immigration law was during his legal studies, when as a volunteer for Haringey Migrant Support Centre he assisted (in a non-advisory capacity) clients of the Centre on a wide range of immigration and related matters, and worked on the preparation of cases including pro bono appeals. Through his pro bono immigration work he also had contact with many prominent NGOs in the immigration sector such as Migrants Organise and Coram Children’s Centre.
He continues to pursue his passion for pro bono work as a barrister, representing immigration clients at bail hearings with Bail for Immigration Detainees and taking on cases through Advocate.
Public Law in a Hostile Environment – Children in the Asylum Context
Documents, Credibility and Fresh Claims in Asylum Law
Bar Professional Training Course, City Law School
Graduate Diploma in Law, City University of London
BA Music (Hons.), University of Oxford
Appointments & Memberships
Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association
Administrative Law Bar Association